lab

For your assigned research demonstration, please find: (1) general instructions for your demonstration; (2) online data collection procedure screenshots; and (3) the data collected. Please see the Research Demonstration Project Module on Canvas for more details on each aspect of the project. Demographics have been posted in the Project Module.

You will meet with your teammate during classes this coming week on 1/27 and 1/29 to work on presentation preparations, while I am available to help you with your statistical analyses and answer any questions. Please join class on Tuesday prepared to be productive. That means each of you should have downloaded SPSS (see my 1/22 Canvas Announcement for download instructions) and reviewed all information in the Research Demonstration Project Module (including project instructions). To get off to a running start in your first team meeting on Tuesday, begin researching your assigned topic now and take a look at the statistical analysis and graph(s) required for your presentation (short videos on how to conduct statistical procedures can be found in the Project Module (click on Statistical Analysis and Reporting).

Your completed presentation PowerPoint must be uploaded through the portal on Canvas no later than Sunday, 2/1. Presentations will begin on Tuesday, 2/3. Should you have any questions on your demonstration that cant wait until class sessions, please use ‘Reply All’ from within the most recent communication – this will enable me to quickly see a history of dialog on the demonstration that is often necessary for a response and ensure that all team members see all communications.

Group Research Demonstration Presentation

Group Research Demonstration Presentation

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

PREPARATION

1 pts

Meets Expectations

The FINAL presentation PowerPoint was uploaded to Canvas by deadline (see Course Schedule).

0 pts

Below Expectations

The PowerPoint presentation was not uploaded on time, or PowerPoint used for debriefing differed from the PowerPoint uploaded.

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

MECHANICS

2 pts

Meets Expectations

PowerPoint included at least one slide each for Introduction/Background, Hypothesis, Methods, Results and References [the actual number of slides required for each of these 5 sections will depend upon individual Demonstration and Results reporting instructions]. At least 3 credible sources were included in Introduction citations and References, in APA format. All slides were clear and error free.

1.5 pts

Needs Improvement

Debriefing materials and mechanics facilitated general understanding of the demonstration and related psychological concept, but one or more criteria for exemplary status was not met.

0 pts

Below Expectations

Poor mechanics impaired classmate understanding.

2 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

STATISTICS

3 pts

Meets Expectations

Statistical analyses and/or graphics required by the specific demonstration instructions were properly conducted, and results were presented in APA format.

2.25 pts

Needs Improvement

Required statistics were conducted and presented, but there was a minor error in presentation or interpretation, or presentation was not 100% APA compliant.

0 pts

Below Expectations

Some aspect of the required statistical or graphical analyses was not conducted (or not presented), or there was a material misinterpretation of findings.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

PRESENTATION CONTENT

3 pts

Meets Expectations

The psychological concept was clearly defined and WHY it occurs was explained. Points in the Introduction clearly build to a concise and testable hypothesis that describes exactly what is being tested. Results were clearly presented and related to the demonstration hypothesis. All questions posed by classmates of the Instructor were completely and articulately answered. All members of the demonstration team appeared to have a thorough comprehension of the topic and contributed equally. Presentation was professional.

2.25 pts

Needs Improvement

Presentation content facilitated general understanding of the demonstration and related psychological concept, but one or more criteria for exemplary status was not met.

0 pts

Below Expectations

Content did not facilitate comprehension of the psychological concept and/or related demonstration.

3 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

CLASSMATE PERCEPTION OF DEMONSTRATION

1 pts

Meets Expectations

Demonstration and debriefing received a mean score of > 4 from classmates’ ratings (5-point Likert scale) Student also completed thoughtful and discriminatory ratings for classmates’ demonstrations, often including constructive comments on performance.

0.75 pts

Needs Improvement

Demonstration and debriefing received a mean score of 3 and 4 from classmates’ demonstration ratings (5-point Likert scale) AND student thoughtfully completed discriminatory ratings for ALL demonstrations.

0 pts

Below Expectations

Demonstration and debriefing received a mean score of < 3 from classmates’ demonstration ratings (5-point Likert scale) -OR- student’s ratings of some demonstrations were missing or were not discriminatory and/or informative.

1 pts

Total Points: 10

you must use spss to input the data

SPSS STATISTICS PREMIUM v31: e94b96be31fa0388ca17

AMOS v31 for Windows ONLY: c7604890f9283082c558