The “Ship Now, Secure Later” Mandate
You are a junior DevOps engineer at a startup that is developing a low-cost remote patient monitoring system for rural healthcare clinics and providers. The initial system is designed for chronic disease management (e.g., patients with diabetes or hypertension) where data is collected throughout the day and synced at intervals. Patients will wear the appropriate type of sensor (continuous pulse oximeter or glucose monitor, for example) that is paired with their smartphone. The app requires the patient to manually trigger a sync or confirm a reading, making it “periodic” rather than truly continuous.
The system is currently in its final week of testing before a hard launch and the testing team you are part of is running the final tests and reviewing the results, split up so that testers do not review the results of the tests they run. While running one of these final audits, you discover a significant vulnerability: the API used to transmit patient vitals (heart rate, oxygen levels) doesn’t use end-to-end encryption. While its behind a basic firewall, a semi-sophisticated “man-in-the-middle” attack could expose patient identities and health data.
You bring this to your testing team leader and the project’s lead architect. They acknowledge the risk but explain that implementing the fix would delay the launch by three weeks. The company is also out of time; if they dont launch this week to secure the next round of funding, the company will not have the funds to continue operating and would not last long enough to deliver the updated system. Forty people, including yourself. will be unemployed.
The project lead architect tells you to “sign off on the security checklist for now.” She promises that a “Critical Security Patch” will be the #1 priority for Sprint 1, starting the day after launch. Your team leader also reminds you that the risk of an exploit of this kind of system is “statistically low” for the 60 to 90 days, particularly considering the relatively small number of initial customers that are expected in that time. He also mentions that “superior orders” mean the liability sits with them, not you.
For this forum, your task is to respond to the following question related to the request that the lead architect made to you:
As a junior-level employee, do you actually have the epistemic authority (the right to claim you know better) to stall a company-saving launch? If you are “just following orders” from a senior software designer and developer with 20 years of experience, does that diminish your moral responsibility for a potential data leak?
Your response should include a clear statement of your position along with a compelling ethical argument in support of that position. Your argument should incorporate verifiable sources of external evidence to support your action where appropriate.
Requirements: One complete paragraph MINIMUM up to three
Get fast, custom help from our academic experts, any time of day.
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts.
Secure 100% Original On Time Delivery