please create a discussion post response to the attached in a 500-word critique by reviewing their summary and
asking questions of your own. What did they do well? Did their Summary help you understand
the organizations mission and how they function? What did you learn? What seems to be
missing? What are some areas in which the peer might have improved their work as far as
content? What academic information can you bring in to add to the discussion? Make sure your
critique is fully developed with external sources, citations, and references. It should be every bit
as strong as your own Summary.
Note: a formal critique does not mean critical. It means that you consider the strengths of your
peers summary and then provide suggestions for improvement and/or ideas for future
exploration of the organization. Strengths AND areas for improvement are required.
The formal critique should be at least 500 words and should contain a salutation.
Academic integration with citations and references are required.
APA
Attached Files (PDF/DOCX): Star of Hope Christian Homeless Shelter.docx, Star of Hope Christian Homeless Shelter.docx
Note: Content extraction from these files is restricted, please review them manually.
Get fast, custom help from our academic experts, any time of day.
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts.
Secure 100% Original On Time Delivery