Rubric Details
- Promptness & Initative
6.25 possible points (25%)
Novice
Did not contribute to the conversation at all or posted after the due date
1.25
Competent
Answered most of the points in the discussion but missed significant clues in diagnosis, differentials and pharmacology based on the information provided
5
Proficient
Answered all required points and discussed important issues related to the diagnosis, differentials and pharmacology based on the information provided
6.25
- Mechanics of writing
6.25 possible points (25%)
Novice
Poor spelling and grammar in posts
3.13
Competent
Some errors in spelling and grammar but overall format was clear
5
Proficient
Submissions were grammatically correct with rare misspellings, easy to read, professional delivery
6.25
- Clinical reasoning & analysis
6.25 possible points (25%)
Novice
Remarks to discussion were opinion based and not backed up by science or other sources, summarized other posts, did not read the assignments or spent minimal time looking up and answering the discussion. Difficult to understand the diagnosis and differentials
3.13
Competent
Thoughtful response with general references: apparent that the student read and completed assignments and spent time thinking about the question and presentation, offered some new insights but did not provoke significant new thinking and further discussion. Easy to understand the pharmacology
5
Proficient
Thoughtful, comprehensive responses with specific references to concepts in the assignment or outside the assignment. The student completed assigned reading, and PowerPoints, articles and videos related to the concept and context. Responses were thought provoking and creative and stimulated new knowledge in pharmacology
6.25
- Peer Responses
- 6.25 possible points (25%)NoviceResponses to peers were minimal and did not add much to the conversation3.13CompetentMost of the response to peers were thoughtful and added to theconversation5ProficientResponse to peers were thoughtful and added to the conversation; made aconcerted effort to stimulate discussion by asking and answering Socraticquestions
- Assigment
- Case One Pt is a 66 yo female who comes to her PCP for c/o nausea, monocular visual loss and dizziness. She has a PMH of HTN, DM2, and HPL. She has had these symptoms for the past few weeks and the episodes come and go but they have occurred more frequently this week. They come on suddenly and disappear within a couple of minutesPSH: Bilateral cataracts 1 year ago with lens implants.Medications: Lisinopril 10 mg po dailyJanumet XR 100/1000mg po dailyCrestor 10mg po dailyDescribe your approach to this patient, questions asked in ROS, focused physical exam highlights, diagnostics ordered.Work through the VINDICATE format and provide your diagnosis and differentials. Explain what abnormal physical assessment signs you will see that support your diagnosis. Please remember to have justification for ROS, focused PE, diagnostic testing ordered and diagnosis and differentials. Please list at least 3 differential diagnoses (top three and your primary diagnosis). You can write this up in an SBAR format.
- I haveattached a sample copy of how the instructor wants us to do our own. This is anexample of someone assignment. Please just follow the sample and instructionsfrom the rubric. Thank you
Requirements: 2-3 pages
Get fast, custom help from our academic experts, any time of day.
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts.
Secure 100% Original On Time Delivery