interprofessional final

To Prepare:

• Review the Resources and identify one change that you believe is called for in your organization/workplace.
• This may be a change necessary to effectively address one or more of the issues you addressed in the Workplace Environment Assessment you submitted in Module 4. It may also be a change in response to something not addressed in your previous efforts. It may be beneficial to discuss your ideas with your organizational leadership and/or colleagues to help identify and vet these ideas.
• Reflect on how you might implement this change and how you might communicate this change to organizational leadership.

The Assignment (5-6-minute narrated PowerPoint presentation):

Change Implementation and Management Plan

Create a 5- or 6-slide narrated PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose.

Your narrated presentation should be 56 minutes in length.

Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following:

• An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (This can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment previously submitted, if relevant.)
• A description of the change being proposed
• Justifications for the change, including why addressing it will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace
• Details about the type and scope of the proposed change
• Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the change
• Identification of a change management team (by title/role)
• A plan for communicating the change you propose
• A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the change you propose

Alternate Submission Method

You may also use Kaltura Personal Capture to record your narrated PowerPoint. This option will require you to create your PowerPoint slides first. Then, follow the Personal Capture instructions outlined on the

page. This page will walk you through downloading the tool and help you become familiar with the features of Personal Capture. When you are ready to begin recording, you may turn off the webcam option so that only “Screen” and “Audio” are enabled. Start your recording and then open your PowerPoint to slide show view. Once the recording is complete, follow the instructions found on the “Posting Your Video in the Classroom Guide” found on the Kaltura Media page for instructions on how to submit your video. For this option, in addition to submitting your video, you must also upload your PowerPoint file which must include your speaker notes.

rubric

Create a 5- or 6-slide PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose. Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following: An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (this can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment). A description of the changes being proposed. Justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace.

40 to >35.0 pts

Excellent

The narrated presentation accurately and completely presents a comprehensive plan to implement proposed changes. … The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary. … The narrated presentation accurately and clearly describes the proposed changes. … The narrated presentation accurately and clearly provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization.

35 to >31.0 pts

Good

The narrated presentation adequately presents a comprehensive plan to implement proposed changes. … The narrated presentation adequately describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary. … The narrated presentation adequately describes the proposed changes. … The narrated presentation adequately provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization.

31 to >27.0 pts

Fair

The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely presents a plan to implement proposed changes. … The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary. … The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the proposed changes. … The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization.

27 to >0 pts

Poor

The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, and incompletely presents a plan to implement proposed changes. … The narrated presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary or executive summary is missing. … The narrated presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the proposed changes or proposed changes are missing. … The narrated presentation inaccurately and vaguely provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization or justifications are missing.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Details about the type and scope of the proposed changes. Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the changes. Identification of a change management team (by title/role). A plan for communicating the changes you propose. A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the changes you propose.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent

The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly details the type and scope of the proposed changes. … The narrated presentation accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. … The narrated presentation accurately and completely identifies a change management team by title/ role. … The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. … The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good

The narrated presentation adequately details the type and scope of the proposed changes. … The narrated presentation adequately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. … The narrated presentation adequately identifies a change management team by title/ role. … The narrated presentation adequately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. … The narrated presentation adequately describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair

The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately details the type and scope of the proposed changes. … The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. … The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately identifies a change management team by title/ role. … The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. … The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.

20 to >0 pts

Poor

The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately details the type and scope of the proposed changes or proposed changes are missing. … The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes or stakeholders are missing. … The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately identifies a change management team by title/ role or change management team is missing. … The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed or communication plan is missing. … The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed or recommendations are missing.

30 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Resource Synthesis

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources. … PowerPoint presentation includes references slide.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource. … PowerPoint presentation includes references slide.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Using proper in-text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources. … PowerPoint presentation includes references slide.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

The response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used. … References slide is incomplete or missing.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Presentation Narration

10 to >0.0 pts

Excellent

Narration is present.

0 pts

Fair

0 pts

Good

0 pts

Poor

Narration is missing.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

PowerPoint Presentation: The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good

Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair

Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Written Expression and FormattingEnglish Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the readers understanding.

5 pts

Total Points: 100