Assignment Instructions

Competency

Integrate advanced physical assessment techniques guided by clinical reasoning and clinical judgment.

Assignment Submission

Submit your presentation in the assignment submission area.Deliverable 2 – Assignment Submission

Rubric Details

Maximum Score

4 points

• Grade for Deliverable 2

  100% of total gradeA – 4 – Mastery4B – 3 – Proficiency3C – 2 – Competence2F – 1 – No Pass1I – 0 – Not Submitted0

• Criterion 1

  0% of total gradeA – 4 – MasteryThoroughly described how to ensure privacy, comfort, safety, and patient understanding throughout the advanced physical assessment, with detailed explanation of each component.0B – 3 – ProficiencyAccurately described how to ensure privacy, comfort, safety, and patient understanding throughout the advanced physical assessment, with sufficient explanation of each component.0C – 2 – CompetenceProvided reasonable description of how to ensure privacy, comfort, safety, and patient understanding throughout the advanced physical assessment, with basic explanation of each component.0F – 1 – No PassAttempted to describe how to ensure privacy, comfort, safety, and patient understanding throughout the advanced physical assessment, with minimal explanation or missing component(s).0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0

• Criterion 2

  0% of total gradeA – 4 – MasteryPresented in-depth discussion of ways to integrate cultural considerations into the advanced physical assessment. Provided thoroughly developed example scenarios.0B – 3 – ProficiencyPresented substantial discussion of ways to integrate cultural considerations into the advanced physical assessment. Provided concise example scenarios.0C – 2 – CompetencePresented adequate discussion of ways to integrate cultural considerations into the advanced physical assessment.0F – 1 – No PassPresented vague or no discussion of ways to integrate cultural considerations into the advanced physical assessment.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0

• Criterion 3

  0% of total gradeA – 4 – MasterySkillfully described inspection, auscultation, percussion, and palpation, thoroughly covering how to explain the techniques to the patient.0B – 3 – ProficiencyPrecisely described inspection, auscultation, percussion, and palpation, consistently covering how to explain the techniques to the patient.0C – 2 – CompetenceAdequately described inspection, auscultation, percussion, and palpation, moderately covering how to explain the techniques to the patient.0F – 1 – No PassAttempted to describe inspection, auscultation, percussion, and palpation, vaguely covering how to explain the techniques to the patient.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0

• Criterion 4

  0% of total gradeA – 4 – MasteryProvided highly adept examples of normal and abnormal findings demonstrating superior clinical reasoning and judgment. Integrated extensive pathophysiological concepts.0B – 3 – ProficiencyProvided complete examples of normal and abnormal findings demonstrating strong clinical reasoning and judgment. Integrated several pathophysiological concepts.0C – 2 – CompetenceProvided reasonable examples of normal and abnormal findings demonstrating basic clinical reasoning and judgment.0F – 1 – No PassProvided vague or no examples of normal and abnormal findings or did not demonstrate clinical reasoning and judgment.0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted0

• Criterion 5

  0% of total gradeA – 4 – MasteryExemplary use of professional language that is free of bias, and thoroughly supported with evidence (in-text citations and references in the correct APA style). Established a concisely stated scholarly position appropriate for purpose, format, style, and audience and free of errors.0B – 3 – ProficiencyPrecise use of professional language that is mostly free of bias, and supported with evidence (in-text citations and references in APA style with occasional errors). Established a concisely stated scholarly position appropriate for purpose, format, style, and audience with minimal errors that do not distract the reader.0C – 2 – CompetenceAdequate use of professional language supported with evidence (in-text citations and references in APA style with numerous errors). Established a concisely stated scholarly position appropriate for purpose, format, style, and audience with errors that distract the reader.0F – 1 – No PassDoes not utilize professional language, does not support with evidence in APA style, and does not establish a scholarly position that is appropriate for purpose, format, style, and audience or contains numerous errors that diminish readability0I – 0 – Not SubmittedNot Submitted

Get fast, custom help from our academic experts, any time of day.

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts.

Secure 100% Original On Time Delivery