Help me reply to 2 discussion posts and reply to people on e…

Discussion 1:

  • Initial Substantive Posts:

Students are expected to listen to the assigned podcast and discuss at least TWO separate themes/points by making thoughtful comments and/or questions regarding the selected themes/points in the assigned video (350-400 words) in the discussion forum each week. For example, you may describe the key points and/or core arguments made by the presenters and/or explain new pieces of information that you learned from the podcast followed by your own reflections on these points/arguments. Moreover, at least 1 outside source (you may NOT include your textbook) cited (in proper APA format) in your posting to support your rationale and thoughts. A reference listing at the end of your posting in proper APA format is also required.

  • Required Replies:

In addition, students are also required to respond to at least one of their classmates posts (e.g., comments, opinions, and questions). Your replies should build on the concept discussed, offer a question to consider, or add a differing perspective, etc. Rather than responding with, “Good post,” explain why the post is “good” (why it is important, useful, insightful, etc.). Or, if you disagree, respectfully share your alternative perspective. Just saying “I agree” or “Good idea” is not sufficient for the posts you would like graded.

reply to them from discussion 1

Feb 1 7:49pm

Reply from Noah L Hawkins

I noticed two ideas in the video. The first idea was the barriers, to health equity. The second idea was the need for organizations to follow through to create change. A key takeaway was that health inequities are not random. Health inequities are rooted in institutional racism. Systemic and institutional racism still shapes access to care the quality of treatment and overall health outcomes, for marginalized populations. I watched the video and the video emphasized that many healthcare organizations have made commitments to justice but the video emphasized that those statements are not enough. The video emphasized that measurable changes, in policy measurable changes in practices and measurable changes, in culture are needed. The video emphasized that without those changes population-level health outcomes will not improve.

The idea connects directly to public health research that shows how social determinants of health such, as race and socioeconomic status affect disease rates and access, to care (Braveman & Gottlieb 2014). I think the idea shows that individual clinical care, when individual clinical care matters, cannot fix health inequities. Broader structural changes are needed.

I see that one important point was the need, for term working together action from health care institutions. In my view the video showed that real progress needs plans. The plans include adding people to the health care workforce building strong partnerships with communities and using data to keep organizations responsible. The approaches follow the “health, in all policies” framework. The framework pushes the idea of putting health equity into decision making in areas of seeing health equity as a separate problem (Rudolph et al. 2013). The sustainable change needs reform inside the institutions. The sustainable change also needs engagement, with the communities they serve.

The video helped me understand how structural racism and health outcomes are linked. The video made me realize that achieving health equity needs action and policy change, not the work of individual healthcare providers. Future public health professionals have a responsibility to advocate for evidence based strategies that address the root causes of health disparities.

References:

Braveman, P., & Gottlieb, L. (2014). The social determinants of health: Its time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Reports, 129(2), 19-31.

Rudolph, L., Caplan, J., Ben-Moshe, K., & Dillon, L. (2013). Health in All Policies: A Framework for State Action. Public Health Institute.

DISCUSSION 2:

Week 2 Discussion Activity

In Chapter 3, there are various epidemiological terms that you’ve probably heard frequently used since the start of the pandemic to describe what is happening. Sometimes when we hear or read the news we aren’t always familiar with the terms being used, which can at times lead to confusion or misunderstanding. Honestly, I often look up words I hear or read that I don’t understand. It helps! After reading chapter 3, answer the questions below.

1) Select two epidemiological terms from chapter 3 that you hear commonly used in reports/news when there is a disease outbreak (e.g. COVID pandemic, foodborne illness outbreaks), and provide their definitions as defined in chapter 3. Did the textbook definitions help you to better understand what the terms meant? Elaborate on whether or not the definitions provided clarity on what the terms meant. (respond in 3-5 sentences)

2) In chapter 3, your book discusses the mortality statistics that inform us of the leading causes of death. When I teach this course in person, I ask the class to tell me what they think the leading cause of death is in the US. What do you think is the leading cause of death is in the US? Every year, cancer is what students usually answer. However, that is incorrect. Heart disease remains the leading cause of death in the US (cancer is closely behind at #2). In your response, tell me the following: what did you guess what the leading cause of death in the US? Are you familiar with the health behaviors that are encouraged to prevent heart disease? Do you think there are enough resources available to the public on information about heart disease and how to prevent it? (respond in 3-5 sentences)

**Your grade will be based on your response to the questions above and commenting on a response posted by one of your classmates. Your response to your classmate should be at least 1-2 sentences.**

**Avoid using ALL CAPITALS, use proper grammar, spelling, and complete sentences, and keep in mind that you will not be able to edit or delete your response once it has been submitted. Once you submit your response, other students in the class will be able to see your response.*

I WILL SEND the other student to whom you need to reply after I post the initial post.

please dont use AI

Requirements: 2 discussions and 2 replies

Get fast, custom help from our academic experts, any time of day.

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts.

✔Secure ✔ 100% Original ✔ On Time Delivery

How To Order?

How Does the Order Process Work?

Fill Out the Order Form

Complete the form, submitting as many details & instructions concerning the requested academic paper as possible. We will pick a suitable author after you pay for the services.

Make the Payment

Proceed with the payment safely, get an email notification of payment confirmation, and receive your Customer Area sign-in details.

Download the Final Paper

Once the Quality Department ensures the proper quality and congruence with all of the requirements, you will receive an email notification. Now, you can access and save the file from your Customer Area.

Our guarantees

What Else Can You 100% Get With a Professional Essay

 
Complete confidentiality

Be assured of comprehensive protection of all your data. From order placement to downloading final papers – professional essay assistance remains confidential & anonymous.

Direct chat with a writer

Keep in touch with your professional essay writer via direct chat to always be keep-up-to-date on your order progress, check paper drafts, or make additional revisions if needed.

Unlimited free revisions

After your order is completed, the best professional essay writers can revise papers as many times as you need to make them flawless. Your total satisfaction is our main priority.

Money-back guarantee

Professional essay writing service is legit & transparent, so you can entirely rely on the writer's responsibility & readiness to fix all the issues. If they cannot do it, you'll get a refund.

What We do.....

Writing

Editing

Rewriting

Proofreading

Research activities

Revision